Community-Identified Implementation Strategies for Promoting the Adoption of HIV Self-Testing in a Southern California American Indian community: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis.

HIV incidence increased by 18% between 2015 and 2019 among American Indians (AIs) despite declining rates in other racial/ethnic groups. Culturally-appropriate implementation of prevention programs is needed to address the intersectional conditions contributing to HIV vulnerabilities experienced by AIs. The objectives of this study were to understand factors influencing HIV testing decisions and identify implementation strategies to promote the acceptability of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in a southern California AI community. A total of 15 semi-structured interviews were completed with adult community members of a southern California AI reservation. Analysis used a rapid analytic approach that was guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework and expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC) compilation. Two team members applied a standardized summary template to elucidate implementation determinants and implementation strategies for adopting HIVST. Barriers to HIV testing identified by community members included HIV-related stigma and privacy concerns within their community. Community members expressed positive perceptions of the acceptability of HIVST, with many identifying ease of use and privacy as appealing attributes. Several implementation strategies were suggested for facilitating the adoption of HIVST, including increasing access to tests by mailing kits to community members and increasing demand for kits through media campaigns (e.g., local flyers, social media posts, and booths at tribal events). Community members also recommended discreet packaging of kits and cultural adaptation of accompanying materials (e.g., educational videos featuring community members). The qualitative input from AI community members facilitated identification of implementation strategies that may promote the acceptability and culturally-appropriateness of HIVST.

RESUMEN: Entre 2015 y 2019, la incidencia del VIH entre los indígenas norteamericanos (INs) aumentó un 18%, a pesar de que en otros grupos étnicos y raciales se observaron reducciones. La implementación culturalmente apropiada de programas preventivos es fundamental para abordar las circunstancias interseccionales que contribuyen a la vulnerabilidad al VIH entre INs. Los objetivos de este estudio fueron comprender los factores que influyen en la decisión de hacerse la prueba del VIH e identificar estrategias para fomentar la aceptabilidad de las auto pruebas, en una comunidad de INs en el Sur de California. Se realizaron 15 entrevistas semiestructuradas con los miembros adultos de una reserva situada en el Sur de California. El análisis se realizó utilizando un método cualitativo rápido, basado en el marco Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) (español: Exploración, Preparación, Implementación y Sostenimiento) así como una recopilación de sugerencias de expertas en implementación de intervenciones, conocida como ERIC. Dos miembros del equipo de investigación utilizaron una plantilla estandarizada resumida para investigar factores determinantes y estrategias para la adopción de las auto pruebas del VIH. Los miembros de la reserva de INs identificaron el estigma asociado al VIH, así como preocupación por la privacidad entre la comunidad, como barreras para realizarse las pruebas del VIH. Los miembros reaccionaron positivamente a la aceptabilidad de las auto pruebas del VIH, destacándola facilidad del uso y la privacidad asociadas con estas pruebas. También, se sugirieron varias estrategias para facilitar la adopción de las auto pruebas, incluyendo el envío de pruebas a miembros de la comunidad y el aumento de la demanda de pruebas a través de difusión (e.g., folletos, publicaciones en las redes sociales, y puestos en eventos tribales). Los miembros también recomendaron que los empaques de las auto pruebas sean discretos, y que contengan materiales educativos culturalmente apropiados. Las contribuciones cualitativas de la comunidad INs ayudaron identificar estrategias de implementación que pueden fomentar la aceptabilidad de las auto pruebas del VIH en una manera culturalmente apropiada.

Real world effectiveness of digital mental health services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented need for mental health services that can be remotely delivered. Digital mental health services that offer personalized care recommendations hold promise to efficiently expand service, but evidence of the effectiveness of digitally delivered mental health care in real-world settings remains limited. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of adults (N = 1,852) receiving care through a digital mental health platform with elevated depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic was analyzed to estimate changes in subjective well-being and clinical improvement in depressive symptoms (using the World Health Organization-Five [WHO-5] Well-Being Index), as well as compare the relative effectiveness and cost of different care utilization patterns. RESULTS: The average improvement in WHO-5 score was 10.1 points (CI: 9.3-10.9, p<0.001) at follow-up, which constituted a medium effect size (d = 0.73). The odds of clinical improvement in depressive symptoms were significantly greater among those who utilized telecoaching (aOR = 2.45, 95%CI: 1.91-3.15, p < .001), teletherapy (aOR = 2.01, 95%CI: 1.57-2.57, p < .001), and both services (aOR = 2.28, 95%CI: 1.67-3.11, p < .001) compared to those who only utilized assessments, adjusting for baseline WHO-5 score, age, sex, and number of days between baseline and follow-up assessments. The average estimated cost of care for telecoaching was $124 per individual, which was significantly less than teletherapy ($413) or both services ($559). CONCLUSION: Digitally delivered care with a therapist and/or coach was effective in improving subjective well-being and clinical improvement in depressive symptoms. Although clinical outcomes were similar across utilization patterns, the cost of care was lowest among those utilizing telecoaching.

Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Telecoaching Delivered Through an Employer-Sponsored Mental Health Benefits Platform.

Introduction: Coaches delivering telemental health services as part of an employer-sponsored benefit may increase access to affordable and effective care. We examined the effectiveness of evidence-based telecoaching delivered via videoconferencing to people requesting mental health services during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Materials and Methods: We analyzed data from 1,228 employees (mean age = 35 ± 8 years; 67.2% female) who utilized telecoaching through the Modern Health benefits platform between March 11, 2020 and March 11, 2021. We used paired samples t tests to examine changes in well-being, burnout, absenteeism, and presenteeism before and after telecoaching and moderated regressions to test whether these changes depended on visit utilization. We analyzed rates of clinical improvement for well-being and reduction from entry in symptoms for burnout. We conducted analyses in the full sample and participants presenting with elevated symptoms at baseline. Results: Participants utilized an average of 2.6 visits. Well-being (p = 0.02) significantly increased, while both presenteeism (p < 0.001) and absenteeism (p < 0.001) significantly decreased at follow-up in our full sample, but represented negligible effect sizes. Burnout was not found to have significantly changed at follow-up in our full sample (p = 0.69). In participants beginning care with elevated depressive-related symptoms, well-being significantly increased (p < 0.001) and 46.3% experienced a clinically relevant improvement. In participants beginning care with elevated levels of burnout, burnout significantly decreased (p < 0.001) and 20.9% experienced a reduction in symptoms from entry. Conclusions: Leveraging videoconferencing, telecoaching had positive effects on mental health and workplace outcomes, even during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence-based telecoaching represents a promising option for achieving optimal outcomes in people who need mental health services.

Does HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Modify the Effect of Partnership Characteristics on Condom Use? A Cross-Sectional Study of Sexual Partnerships Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in San Francisco, California.

Increasing rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the United States among men who have sex with men (MSM) have raised concerns that pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been associated with higher engagement in condomless anal intercourse (CAI). While partnership characteristics have previously been found to influence condom use, the extent to which PrEP use may modify their effect on CAI remains unknown. A secondary analysis of 535 sexual partnerships from a cross-sectional study in San Francisco was conducted to evaluate interactions between PrEP use and partnership characteristics on CAI. Bivariate and multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) logistic regression models were used to estimate relative measures of association, adjusted for confounding by seroconcordance and partnership type, as well as account for repeated partnerships per respondent. Partnerships where both partners used biomedical prevention had significantly greater odds of CAI [odds ratio (OR) = 5.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.27-11.9] compared to those where only one partner used biomedical prevention, while those where neither partner used biomedical prevention had significantly lower odds of CAI (OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40-0.93). There was no significant association between meeting place (online vs. offline) and sexual risk taking (OR = 1.03, p = 0.894). Having one partner disclose their HIV status (compared to neither partner having disclosed) was associated with significantly higher odds of CAI among partnerships of PrEP-using MSM [adjusted OR (aOR) = 5.28, 95% CI: 1.91-14.61], while the association was not significant among the partnerships of non-PrEP-using MSM (aOR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.75-2.21). Differences in condom use among MSM using PrEP may not be well explained by differences in the effect of partnership characteristics. MSM using PrEP appear to commonly practice biomedical matching and high engagement in CAI with other biomedical prevention users, which could indicate relatively concentrated sexual networks and partly explain their disproportionate risk for STIs. Future studies should further investigate biomedical matching to develop interventions that further promote the sexual health of those using PrEP.